Appeal No. 1998-2645 Page 2 Application No. 08/815,747 We AFFIRM-IN-PART. BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a wet gas stripper which utilizes a liquid spray for separating entrained particulate matter from a moving gas stream (specification, p. 1). A copy of claim 1 under appeal appears in the appendix to the appellant's reply brief (Paper No. 16, filed July 20, 1998). A copy of claims 3 to 10 under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief (Paper No. 14, filed April 9, 1998). The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Clark 2,802,543 Aug. 13, 1957 Claims 1 and 3 to 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellant regards as the invention.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007