THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MARGARET A. KATO and FRANK S. GLAUG _____________ Appeal No. 1998-2817 Application No. 08/455,366 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and ABRAMS and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 7, 9 through 13, 15 through 19, 21 through 26 and 28 through 36. These claims constitute all of the claims pending in this application. We AFFIRM and enter new rejections pursuant to 37 CFR 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007