Appeal No. 1998-2818
Application 08/550,521
The rejection of claim 8 as being unpatentable over Uni-
Charm or Kao in view of Daio ‘051, Daio ‘052 and Robertson,
and further in view of Buell is affirmed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JOHN F. GONZALES )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch and Birch
P. O. Box 747
Falls Church, VA 22040-0747
20
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007