Ex parte WOLF et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2831                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/541,013                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a safety-shielded                 
          trocar.  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the              
          appendix to the appellants' brief.                                          


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Moll                          4,601,710                     July            
          22, 1986                                                                    
          Holmes et al.            4,931,042                     June  5,             
          1990                                                                        
          (Holmes)                                                                    



               Claims 6-8 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)              
          as being anticipated by Holmes.                                             


               Claims 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)               
          as being anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35                    
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 as obvious over Holmes.                                               











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007