Appeal No. 1998-2831 Page 17
Application No. 08/541,013
with respect to parent claim 6. 4
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 6-8 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed; the
decision of the examiner to reject claims 11 and 12 under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103
is reversed; and the decision of the examiner to reject claim
9 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
4We have reviewed the reference to Moll applied in this
rejection but find nothing therein which makes up for the
deficiencies of Holmes discussed above with regard to claim 6.
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007