Appeal No. 1998-2838 Page 3
Application No. 08/591,801
BACKGROUND
The appellants' invention relates to bicycles for
exercise and/or therapeutic purposes (specification, p. 1). A
substantially correct copy of the claims under appeal is set
forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief. 1
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Lin 4,705,493 Nov. 10,
1987
Pitzen et al. 4,923,193 May 8,
1990
(Pitzen)
Taylor 5,496,238 March 5,
1996
(filed Aug. 19, 1993)
Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 13, 14 and 17-20 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Taylor in view of
Lin.
1We note that the word "identical" was misspelled in
claims 1 and 13.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007