Ex parte KOIFMAN et al. - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                  
              today was not written for publication and is not binding                
                               precedent of the Board.                                
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte VLADIMIR KOIFMAN,                               
                                    YACHIN AFEK,                                      
                                        and                                           
                                   SERGIO LIBERMAN                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-2874                                  
                             Application No. 08/568,718                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative               
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                   
          1 through 10 and 12.                                                        
               The disclosed invention relates to a noise cancellation                
          method and circuit for use with a digital-to-analog converter.              


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007