Ex parte GREGOIRE et al. - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                       
                       for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                      

                                                                                                                    Paper No. 43                        

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                  Ex parte JEAN-PIERRE GREGOIRE and MICHEL BONNION                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1998-2927                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 07/584,667                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent                                                                             
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 1 to 4.  Claims 5 to 22 have been allowed.                                                                         
                 No claim has been canceled.1                                                                                                           


                          1We find the appellants' indication on page 1 of the                                                                          
                 brief (Paper No. 38, filed August 11, 1997) that, to the best                                                                          
                 of their knowledge and belief, there are no related appeals                                                                            
                 which would have a bearing on this appeal to be clearly in                                                                             
                 error since the rejection before us in this appeal was first                                                                           
                 made as a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR  1.196(b) by                                                                           
                 another panel of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences                                                                         
                 in their February 23, 1996 DECISION ON APPEAL (Paper No. 29).                                                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007