The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LEONARD M. VAN ROSSEN
____________
Appeal No. 1998-3001
Application No. 08/318,645
____________
HEARD: OCTOBER 11, 2000
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
2, 4 through 9, all of the claims remaining in the
application. In an entered amendment after final (Paper No.
21), claim 8 was amended.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a dust bag and to a
method for producing a dust bag. A basic understanding of the
invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007