Ex parte DALAL et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-3033                                                        
          Application No. 08/794,982                                                  

          composition . . . comprising a composition of pure metal and a              
          portion of said solder.”  When the solder ball 40 and the thin              
          solder layer 50 on device 10 in Noll are secured to conductive              
          pads 64 on substrate 68, “[t]he solder mass 40 is not affected              
          by this soldering operation” (column 3, lines 40 and 41).                   
          Thus, the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 23 through                 
          30, 32, 33 and 36 is reversed because Noll does not form a                  
          eutectic composition comprising a pure metal and a portion of               
          solder ball 40.  The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)/35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                  
          rejections of claims 38 and 39 are reversed for the same                    
          reason.                                                                     
          The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 31, 34, 35 and 37                
          is reversed because Best does not cure the noted shortcoming                
          in the teachings of Noll.                                                   
                                      DECISION                                        
               With the exception of the indefiniteness rejection of                  
          claim 24, all of the rejections are reversed.  Accordingly,                 
          the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                           






                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007