Ex parte SUPPELSA et al. - Page 1

                                        THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                              
               The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
               not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                
                                                                                                       Paper No. 10               
                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                Ex parte ANTHONY J. SUPPELSA, RICHARD J. KOLCZ,                                                   
                                         CARL M. THIELK, and BRANKO AVANIC                                                        
                                                    Appeal No. 1998-3045                                                          
                                                   Application 08/612,6931                                                        
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                                
               Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LEE and MEDLEY,                                           
               Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                      
               LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  
                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner’s rejection of                         
               appellants’ claims 1-15.  The real party in interest is Motorola, Inc.                                             
                                          References relied on by the Examiner                                                    

               Tanaka et al.                 Patent No. 4,725,925                   Feb. 16, 1988                                 
               Neumann et al.                Patent No. 5,122,620                   Jun. 16, 1992                                 

                              Application for patent filed March 8, 1996.                                                         

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007