Appeal No. 1998-3060 Page 4
Application No. 08/703,932
Claims 4 to 6, 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of
Nitschke '141 and Kulig as applied to claims 1, 11, 12/11 and
13 to 16 above, and further in view of Tsutsui.
Claims 10 and 12/10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of Nitschke
'141 and Kulig as applied to claims 1, 11, 12/11 and 13 to 16
above, and further in view of Orain.
Claims 1, 7 to 9 and 13 to 16 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings
of Frank and Kulig.
Claims 4 to 6, 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of
Frank and Kulig as applied to claims 1, 7 to 9 and 13 to 16
above, and further in view of Nitschke '141 and Tsutsui.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007