Ex parte STOLTZE et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1998-3366                                                        
          Application No. 08/591,506                                                  


               The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                
          support of the rejections are:                                              
          Burton et al. (Burton)       5,026,377            Jun.  25,                 
          1991                                                                        
          Lee                          5,292,321            Mar.   8,                 
          1994                                                                        
          Forman et al. (Forman)       5,505,699            Apr.   9,                 
          1996                                                                        
          Lau et al. (Lau)             5,603,721            Feb.  18,                 
          1997                                                                        
          (filed Nov. 13,                                                             
          1995)                                                                       
               The following rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are before              
          us for review:                                                              
               a) claims 1-4, 7, 13 and 14, unpatentable over Lau in                  
          view      of Burton;                                                        
               b) claims 8 and 9, unpatentable over Lau in view of                    
          Burton            and further in view of Forman; and                        
               c) claims 10-12, unpatentable over Lau in view of Burton               
          and          Forman, and further in view of Lee.                            
               The rejections are explained in the examiner’s answer                  
          (Paper No. 14, mailed April 28, 1998).                                      
               The opposing viewpoints of appellants are set forth in                 
          the main brief (Paper No. 13, filed January 22, 1998) and the               
          reply brief (Paper No. 15, filed June 22, 1998).                            

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007