Appeal No. 1999-0195 Application 08/507,424 withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not readable on the elected invention. Appellants’ invention pertains to a wheel blocking device. Details of the invention can be readily understood upon reading the appealed claims, a correct copy of which appears in an appendix to appellants’ brief. The references of record relied upon by the examiner in support of a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are: Cone 4,207,019 Jun. 10, 1980 Blunden 4,679,974 Jul. 14, 1987 Claims 1-8 and 14-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blunden in view at Cone. The teachings of the applied references are fully set forth on page 3 of appellants’ brief and need not be repeated here. Claims 1-8 Considering first the § 103 rejection of claim 1, the essence of the rejection is the examiner’s position that it 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007