Ex parte HOFFMANN - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was     
               not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding    
               precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                Paper No. 31          
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                            Ex parte JOHN A. HOFFMANN III                             
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-0256                                 
                              Application No. 08/828,616                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 HEARD: March 8, 2000                                 
                                     ____________                                     
          Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        




                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                    
          finally rejecting claims 1, 4-13 and 16, which at that point                
          constituted all of the claims remaining of record in the                    
          application.   Subsequently, in the Answer, the examiner                    
          indicated that claims                                                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007