THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD A. OPENCHOWSKI, SCOTT A. BEATTY,
ANDREAS M. HAAS, KENNETH F. PACKER and JITEN V. SHAH
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0368
Application 08/636,033
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claim 1. Claims 2-20, the only other claims
remaining in the application, have been allowed. Two
amendments filed subsequent to the final rejection have been
submitted, however, neither has been entered.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007