The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. FAULKS, PAUL J. SERBIAK
and JODY D. SUPRISE
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0369
Application No. 08/575,926
____________
HEARD: January 11, 2001
____________
Before STAAB, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-12, 14-16, 19, 21-24, 26-42 and 44-51. 1
Upon further consideration, the examiner now views dependent
1See the second final rejection, mailed December 9, 1997
(Paper No. 14).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007