Ex parte CHRYSLER et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-0421                                                                       Page 2                
              Application No. 08/587,866                                                                                       


                                                      BACKGROUND                                                               
                      The appellants' invention relates generally to heat sink structures having high-                         
              performance cooling capabilities, more particularly to heat sinks having a large plurality of fin                
              structures which exhibit a large surface area per unit volume and, even more particularly, to                    
              high-performance millifin heat sinks having improved structural rigidity, excellent thermal                      
              transfer characteristics and ease of manufacture (specification, page 1).  Further understanding                 
              of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the                        
              appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                               
                      The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                 
              claims are:                                                                                                      
              Minakami et al. (Minakami)                   5,381,859                             Jan. 17, 1995                 
              Kashima                                      S64-38593                             Feb.  8, 19891                
                      (Japanese published unexamined patent application)                                                       
                      The following rejection is before us for review.                                                         
                      Claims 1-4, 6-10, 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                
              unpatentable over Minakami in view of Kashima.                                                                   
                      Reference is made to the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 15 and 17) and the answer                     
              (Paper No. 16) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner with regard to                    
              the merits of this rejection.                                                                                    

                      1An English language translation of this reference, prepared by the Patent and Trademark Office, is      
              appended hereto.                                                                                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007