Ex parte ELLIS et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1999-0512                                                        
          Application No. 08/701,979                                                  




               We reverse the rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103.                                                                        


               Claim 11, dependent from claim 10, requires that the                   
          collar be formed as a single member with the catheter                       


               We incorporate herein our discussion relative to claim 8,              
          supra, the rejection of which we did not sustain.  As we see                
          it, the Ryan teaching of bonding an end cap to a catheter, by               
          itself, would not, in our opinion, have been suggestive to one              
          having ordinary skill in the art of forming an end cap                      
          (collar) as a single (one part) member with a catheter, as now              
          claimed.  We do note again, however, the disclosure in                      
          appellants’ application as referenced in footnote 4. above.                 


                                       Claim 6                                        


               We reverse the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          103.                                                                        


                                         12                                           





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007