Ex parte FORBES-ROBINSON - Page 7




              Appeal No. 1999-0613                                                                    Page 7                 
              Application No. 08/592,025                                                                                     


              to the subject matter recited in claim 1.  This being the case, we will not sustain the                        
              rejection of independent claim 1 or, it follows, of claim 2, which depends therefrom.                          
                      Independent claim 4 also is directed to a motor vehicle steering assembly, and                         
              differs from claim 1 in that it recites a pair of sleeve bearings, one at each end of the                      
              tubular housing, and it further specifies that the material from which the bearings are made                   
              is such that the sleeve will be “deformed or destroyed” (emphasis added) in the event                          
              abrasive foreign matter enters between the steering shaft and the housing.  For the                            
              reasons set forth above with regard to claim 1, the applied references also fail to establish                  
              a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the subject matter of independent claim                      
              4 and dependent claims 5-7, and we will not sustain the rejection.                                             










                                                        SUMMARY                                                              
                      The rejection of claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is not sustained.                    


                      The rejection of claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is sustained                         









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007