THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PETER JARZYNA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0628 Application No. 08/806,5031 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STAAB, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-15, which are all of the claims pending in this application. 1According to the appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 08/502,979, filed July 17, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application No. 08/161,045, filed December 3, 1993, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007