Ex parte POPE - Page 6




              Appeal No. 1999-0644                                                                       Page 6                
              Application No. 08/459,460                                                                                       


              1238 (1978).  With respect to the description requirement, the court in Vas-Cath, Inc. v.                        
              Mahurkar 935 F.2d at 1563-64, 19 USPQ2d at 1117 stated:                                                          
                      35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, requires a "written description of the                                 
                      invention" which is separate and distinct from the enablement requirement.  The                          
                      purpose of the "written description" requirement is broader than to merely                               
                      explain how to "make and use"; the applicant must also convey with reasonable                            
                      clarity to those skilled in the art that, as of the filing date sought, he or she was                    
                      in possession of the invention.  The invention is, for purposes of the "written                          
                      description" inquiry, whatever is now claimed.                                                           
                      With these authorities in mind, we have carefully reviewed the original disclosure and,                  
              like the examiner, fail to find descriptive support for the seal runner surface being "shaped to                 
              provide radial convergence of said seal gap," as is encompassed by the language of claim 5 as                    
              now amended, or "formed to converge toward [the sealing face surface]," as encompassed by                        
              the language of claim 12 as now amended.   Specifically, the appellant's specification indicates,4                                                                    
              in the embodiment of Figures 1A and 1B, that the convergence of the seal gap (21) is achieved                    
              by a step (42), in the ring sealing surface (26), extending toward the runner surface (20) to                    
              form a sealing dam (page 6, lines 11-15) and that the seal ring (24) is formed with a geometry                   
              such that a converging flow path is provided either as a step, a taper in the direction of the fluid             
              flow to narrow the gap, or a combination of a step and a taper (page 10, lines 10-14).  Further,                 
              we note that original independent claim 1 recited, in lines 16-17, "said sealing face being                      
              formed to converge toward said runner surface" (emphasis added) and that original claim 5, the                   

                      4The language "at least one of [said surfaces]" is sufficiently broad to encompass either the seal ring  
              surface or the seal runner surface being shaped to converge.                                                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007