THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM L. PARISH JR., PHILLIP G. MARTIN and
PATRICK D. HYDE
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-0687
Application 08/560,315
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 36,
38, 41-55, 57, 58 and 68-72, all the claims remaining in the
present application. Previously appealed claims 37, 56 and
59-67 have been canceled by appellants. Claim 36 is
illustrative:
36. A method of adhering a lens block to a
compound surface of an ophthalmic lens blank,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007