Appeal No. 1999-0695 Page 8 Application No. 08/427,018 the AAPA in view of Benson. We have reviewed the additional teachings of Weiss, Bowen and Winter but find nothing therein which overcomes the above-noted deficiency of the combination of the AAPA and Benson. Accordingly, we also shall not sustain the examiner's 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections of claims 6 and 7 as being unpatentable over the AAPA in view of Benson, Weiss and Bowen and claims 8, 10-12 and 21 as being unpatentable over the AAPA in view of Benson and Winter. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 4-12 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007