Ex parte SUNAGA et al. - Page 3




             Appeal No. 1999-0704                                                                Page 3               
             Application No. 08/558,661                                                                               


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                          
                    The appellants' invention relates to an intra-line fishing rod provided with annular              
             fishline guides or a spiral fishline guide within a rod tube to form an improved inner surface           
             which reduces interior frictional resistance on the fishline (specification, page 1).  An                
             understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 25,               
             which appear in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                   
                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed          
             claims are:                                                                                              
             Kelly                              249,360                            Aug. 15, 1963                      
                    (Australian patent specification)                                                                 
             Harada                             5-88259                            Dec.   3, 19932                    
                    (Japanese published unexamined utility patent application)                                        
                    The following rejections are before us for review.                                                
             (1)    Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8-16, 23 and 25-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being               
             unpatentable over Kelly.                                                                                 
             (2)    Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kelly, as               
             applied to claim 1 above, in further view of Harada.                                                     






                    2An English language translation of this reference, prepared by the Patent and Trademark Office, is
             appended hereto.                                                                                         







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007