Ex parte NOONE et al. - Page 1




                                      THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is             
                                                             not binding precedent of the Board.                                                          
                                                                                                                          Paper No. 27                    
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                     ____________                                                                         
                                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                        
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                     ____________                                                                         
                                      Ex parte MICHAEL J. NOONE and WILLIAM C. WOELLNER                                                                   
                                                                     ____________                                                                         
                                                                Appeal No. 1999-0705                                                                      
                                                             Application No. 08/129,615                                                                   
                                                                     ____________                                                                         
                                                                       ON BRIEF                                                                           
                                                                     ____________                                                                         
                  Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, NASE and BAHR, Administrative                                                    
                  Patent Judges.                                                                                                                          
                  BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                      




                                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                          
                           This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 6, 13-17,                                        
                  19, 22-26, 28-30, 32, 33 and 35, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                               
                  Claims 22 and 35 were amended after the final rejection (see Paper No. 21, filed March 23,                                              
                  1998).  This amendment has been entered, pursuant to the examiner's advisory action (Paper                                              
                  No. 22).                                                                                                                                







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007