THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEFAN ETTER, BEAT STULZ, THOMAS NIETLISPACH,
CHRISTIAN GILLIERON and CHRISTIAN MOY
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0709
Application No. 08/400,335
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 15-23. Claims
1-14 and 24-86, the only other claims pending in this application, stand withdrawn from further
consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being directed to a non-elected invention.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007