Ex parte MCNEILUS et al. - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                     

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                   not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                       Paper No. 28              
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                Ex parte GARWIN McNEILUS, RONALD E. CHRISTENSON                                                  
                                                   and WILBUR R. HARRIS                                                          
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                      Appeal No. 1999-0711                                                       
                                                   Application No. 08/876,869                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                           
               Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
               BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                




                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11, 48, 49, 52,                 
               53 and 55-57, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                            













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007