Ex parte SAWADA et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-0933                                                                                       Page 2                      
                 Application No. 08/512,396                                                                                                             


                          Appellants' invention relates to an automotive brake-fluid pressure control                                                   
                 apparatus employed for example in traction control during acceleration slippage. A                                                     
                 copy of representative claim 1, the only independent claim on appeal, can be found                                                     
                 in the Appendix to appellants' brief.1                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                       
                          The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting                                               
                 the appealed claims is:                                                                                                                

                 Willmann                                      GB 2 257 214 A                             Jan. 6,                                       
                 1993                                                                                                                                   
                 (Published British Patent Application)                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                       

                          Claims 1 through 4, 6 and 8 through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                         
                 § 102(b) as being anticipated by Willmann.                                                                                             








                          1While the examiner has indicated that the copy of the claims in the Appendix                                                 
                 is correct (answer, page 2), we note that the Appendix includes two claims numbered                                                    
                 as “2.”  A review of the record shows that the first claim 2 listed in the Appendix is the                                             
                 correct claim on appeal, while the second claim numbered as “2” was the original                                                       
                 claim that was amended in Paper No. 10, filed August 7, 1997.                                                                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007