THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KEVIN P. LEAHY and COREY D. JONES
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-0936
Application No. 08/890,263
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claim 3 in this broadening reissue application
based on appellants’ U.S. Patent No. 5,528,828, issued June
25, 1996. Claims 1 and 2, the only other claims pending in
the application, have been allowed.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007