Appeal No. 1999-0939 Page 3
Application No. 08/593,334
mailed July 14, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning in
support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 18,
filed April 28, 1998) and reply brief (Paper No. 20, filed
September 14, 1998) for the appellant's arguments
thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellant's specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellant and the
examiner. Upon evaluation of all the evidence before us, it
is our conclusion that the evidence adduced by the examiner is
insufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness
with respect to the claims under appeal. Accordingly, we will
not sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 13 through 23
under
35 U.S.C. § 103. Our reasoning for this determination
follows.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007