Ex parte CLAR et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1058                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/832,960                                                  


               A copy of the appealed claims is appended to the brief                 
          (Paper No. 28).                                                             
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Yoshino        5,020,863         Jun.  4, 1991                              
          Steiner et al. (Steiner)   5,350,225         Sep. 27, 1994                  
          (filed Mar. 17, 1993)                                                       
                        Claims 1 through 14 stand rejected under 35                  
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Yoshino in view of               
          Steiner.                                                                    
               The full text of the examiner's rejection and the                      
          response to the arguments presented by appellants appear in                 
          the Office actions mailed February 6 and July 18, 1997 (Paper               
          Nos. 16 and 22, respectively) and the answer (Paper No. 29,                 
          mailed December 1, 1998), while the complete statement of                   
          appellants’ arguments can be found in the brief (Paper No. 28,              
          filed August 24, 1998).                                                     

          OPINION                                                                     













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007