Ex parte BERTUS et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 33              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte BRENT J. BERTUS,                                
                          HAROLD W. MARK, JOHN S. ROBERTS,                            
                               and ARNOLD M. SCHAFFER                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-1252                                  
                               Application 08/648,520                                 
                                     __________                                       
                               HEARD: March 23, 2000                                  
                                     __________                                       

          Before GARRIS, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1                
          through 4, 9 through 15, 17 through 27, 29 through 39 and 42                
          through 71 which are all of the claims pending in the                       
          application.                                                                
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007