Appeal No. 1999-1462
Application No. 08/747,881
example 2, clearly, when the two rollings are performed with a
Hagino’s disclosed reduction ratio of 60% at each pass, one
gets a flat cable of outside thickness of 640 µm, wherein the
thickness of each superconductor wire is reduced to 20 µm,
thereby yielding a ratio of 3.125%, see figs. 5 to 8. This
meets the claimed ratio of each superconductor wire to the
outside thickness of the metal sheath. Therefore, we sustain
the obviousness rejection of claim 1 and its grouped claims 2,
3 and 6 over Hagino, Ochiai and Schwartzkopf.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007