Ex parte GAPCO - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-1480                                                        
          Application No. 08/523,330                                                  




               Claims 53 and 54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over McRae in view of Taylor as applied               
          to claim 52, and further in view of Schmalz.                                


               Claim 56 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over McRae in view of Taylor as applied to               
          claim 52, and further in view of Linsalato.                                 


               Claims 57-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                
          being unpatentable over McRae in view of Thomas.                            


               Claims 60 and 61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over McRae in view of Thomas as applied               
          to claim 57 above, and further in view of Schmalz.                          


               Claim 62 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over McRae in view of Thomas as applied to               
          claim 57 above, and further in view of Linsalato.                           


               Claims 63-65, 67 and 70 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007