Ex parte GAPCO - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-1480                                                        
          Application No. 08/523,330                                                  




               Claims 53 and 54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over McRae in view of Taylor as applied               
          to claim 52, and further in view of Schmalz.                                


               Claim 56 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over McRae in view of Taylor as applied to               
          claim 52, and further in view of Linsalato.                                 


               Claims 57-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103(a) as                
          being unpatentable over McRae in view of Thomas.                            


               Claims 60 and 61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over McRae in view of Thomas as applied               
          to claim 57 above, and further in view of Schmalz.                          


               Claim 62 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over McRae in view of Thomas as applied to               
          claim 57 above, and further in view of Linsalato.                           


               Claims 63-65, 67 and 70 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007