THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EVELIN HORNEMANN, MARTIN EBNER,
and PETER KOLB
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-1486
Application 08/670,806
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 3,
7, 9, and 11 through 17, all of the claims remaining in the
application. However, on page 6 of the answer (Paper No. 17),
the examiner expressly withdrew the respective rejections of
claim 11 and claims 13, 16, and 17. The examiner indicates
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007