Appeal No. 1999-1491
Application No. 08/386,670
The rejections of claims 13 through 17 and 20 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Ledesma in view of Deck
and Solin is reversed.
The rejection of claims 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being obvious over Ledesma in view of Deck and Solin
as applied to claim 17 and further in view of Mueller is
reversed.
The rejection of claim 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being obvious over Ledesma in view of Deck and Solin as
applied to claim 17 and further in view of Kelly is reversed.
The rejection of claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being obvious over Ledesma in view of Deck and Solin as
applied to claim 13 and further in view of Burpo is reversed.
The rejection of claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
obvious over Ledesma in view of Kelly is affirmed.
19
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007