THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHINYA TAKIZAWA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1504
Application No. 08/787,262
____________
HEARD: February 9, 2000
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and BAHR,
Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11-15, 18-22,
25 and 26. Claims 1-10 have been canceled and claims 16, 17, 23 and 24, the only other
claims remaining in the application, have been indicated as allowable if rewritten in independent
form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims from which
they depend.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007