Appeal No. 1999-1533 Page 13
Application No. 08/666,948
the movement of said delivery member and said positioning
member as one body along said direction" as recited in claim
1. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claims
2, 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 1, 2, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. §
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007