THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS A. WOLFORD
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1716
Application No. 08/888,005
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 13-15 and 22-28, which constitute all
of the claims remaining of record in the application.
The appellant's invention is directed to an apparatus for
transmitting rotary motion through a flex point. The subject
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007