Ex parte HATTORI - Page 1




                           THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                       

             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                           not binding precedent of the Board.                                
                                                                                       Paper No. 38           
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                          Ex parte KENICHI HATTORI                                            
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal No. 1999-1721                                            
                                            Application No. 08/734,125                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                            HEARD: January 27, 2000                                           
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before ABRAMS, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
            BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                




                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 2, 3, 6-8, 35     
            and 37.  Claims 5 and 9-33 stand withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR                
             1.142(b) as being directed to a non-elected species and claims 36 and 38 stand objected to as   
            being dependent upon a rejected claim.  No other claims are pending in this application.  We      
            a0.                                                                                               
            ffirm-in-part and enter a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR  1.196(b).                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007