THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENICHI HATTORI
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1721
Application No. 08/734,125
____________
HEARD: January 27, 2000
____________
Before ABRAMS, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 2, 3, 6-8, 35
and 37. Claims 5 and 9-33 stand withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR
§ 1.142(b) as being directed to a non-elected species and claims 36 and 38 stand objected to as
being dependent upon a rejected claim. No other claims are pending in this application. We
a0.
ffirm-in-part and enter a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007