Ex parte FITE - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 23           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                 Ex parte JOHN FITE                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-1979                                  
                             Application No. 08/758,788                               
                                    ____________                                      
                              HEARD: February 07, 2000                                
                                    ____________                                      
          Before COHEN, MCQUADE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to                  
          allow claims 1, 6, 20, 26, 28 and 29, as amended subsequent to              
          the final rejection.   Claims 10, 11, 13, 25 and 27 have been1                                                       




               See the amendment filed August 26, 1998 (Paper No. 11).1                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007