Ex parte CHINN et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 29              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte KEVIN S. CHINN                                
                                and RICHARD A. HAACK                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-1986                                  
                               Application 08/677,776                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                               HEARD: FEBRUARY 7, 2000                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, McQUADE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21                
          through 27 and 29 through 37, as amended subsequent to that                 
          rejection.  These claims constitute all of the claims                       
          remaining in the application.                                               

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007