Appeal No. 1999-2193 Page 11
Application No. 08/975,338
claimed invention from the disclosure coupled with information
known in the art without undue experimentation. 3
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, is reversed.
3Our decision in the case should not be taken as
supporting the proposition that Figures 2 and 3 should not be
corrected to remove the inaccuracies therefrom. In fact, it
may be that Figures 2 and 3 are not required and could be
deleted.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007