Appeal No. 1999-2200
Application No. 08/896,063
Appeal No. 2000-1780: Reversed
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 22-23 and 34-38 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Keinanen in view of Sommer ’90 and
McNamara.
NMDA Receptors:
Appeal No. 1996-3140: Affirmed-in-Part and Remanded
We affirm the examiner’s rejection of claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 112
second paragraph.
We remand the application to the examiner to further develop the rejection of
claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the cDNA that was
described in Figure 2 on page 33 of Moriyoshi.
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-11, 14 and 15 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Moriyoshi in view of Puckett, Grandy
and Zhou.
Appeal No. 1999-1377: Reversed
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claim 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph.
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Monyer in view of Puckett, Schofield, and
Grenningloh.
127
Page: Previous 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007