Ex parte JARVIS - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                      
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                     
                                                                                                                      Paper No. 9                       
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                         Ex parte JACK D. JARVIS                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1999-2439                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/731,8571                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                          
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 4, 5 and 14 to 20, which are all of the                                                                            
                 claims pending in this application.                                                                                                    


                          We REVERSE.                                                                                                                   



                          1Application for patent filed October 21, 1996.                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007