Ex parte GABRIUS et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1999-2443                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 08/857,144                                                  


          mechanical and electrical connection to a lighting track" is                
          not readable on the wires 27 of Mabrey.                                     


               In proceedings before the Patent and Trademark Office                  
          (PTO), the PTO applies to the verbiage of the claims before it              
          the broadest reasonable meaning of the words in their ordinary              
          usage as they would be understood by one of ordinary skill in               
          the art, taking into account whatever enlightenment by way of               
          definitions or otherwise that may be afforded by the written                
          description contained in the appellants' specification.  In re              
          Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir.                
          1997).  See also In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1548, 218 USPQ                 
          385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983).  Furthermore, a technical term is                
          interpreted as having the meaning that it would be given by                 
          persons experienced in the field of the invention, unless it                
          is apparent from the application and the prosecution history                
          that the inventor used the term with a different meaning.  See              
          Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. BP Chemicals Ltd., 78 F.3d 1575,                  
          1578, 38 USPQ2d 1126, 1129 (Fed. Cir. 1996).                                










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007