Ex parte GRABHORN - Page 6

          Appeal No. 1999-2446                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 08/705,592                                                  

               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 6, 7, 9 to 17              
          and 19 to 25 under 35 U.S.C.  112, second paragraph.                       

               The second paragraph of 35 U.S.C.  112 requires claims                
          to set out and circumscribe a particular area with a                        
          reasonable degree of precision and particularity.  In re                    
          Johnson, 558 F.2d 1008, 1015, 194 USPQ 187, 193 (CCPA 1977).                
          In making this determination, the definiteness of the language              
          employed in the claims must be analyzed, not in a vacuum, but               
          always in light of the teachings of the prior art and of the                
          particular application disclosure as it would be interpreted                
          by one possessing the ordinary level of skill in the pertinent              
          art.  Id.                                                                   

               The examiner's focus during examination of claims for                  
          compliance with the requirement for definiteness of 35 U.S.C.               
           112, second paragraph, is whether the claims meet the                     
          threshold requirements of clarity and precision, not whether                
          more suitable language or modes of expression are available.                
          Some latitude in the manner of expression and the aptness of                
          terms is permitted even though the claim language is not as                 

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007