Appeal No. 1999-2765 Page 6 Application No. 08/752,396 1985). We are bound to consider the disclosure of each reference for what it fairly teaches one of ordinary skill in the art, including not only the specific teachings, but also the inferences which one of ordinary skill in the art would reasonably have been expected to draw therefrom. See In re Boe, 355 F.2d 961, 148 USPQ 507 (CCPA 1966); and In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 159 USPQ 342 (CCPA 1968). With this as background, we analyze the prior art applied by the examiner in the rejection of the claims on appeal. Hunts' invention relates to doll houses, play houses, sheds and the like, and more particularly to those that are provided in kit form for simplified assembly. Hunts teaches (column 1, lines 31-41) that the basic concept of his invention is that it provides specially configured panel edges preferably about all peripheral edges of a plurality of rigid, sheet-like panels and a variety of correspondingly configured panel connector members arranged to engage each panel edge in a positively locking, yet releasable, snap-fit connection, to provide a panel connection system in which panels can bePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007