Ex parte WUNDERLICH et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-2812                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/724,049                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a method and                      
          apparatus for transverse cutting of multi-ply web material                  
          and, more particularly, to a continuous motion saw                          
          (specification, p. 1).  A copy of claims 17 to 23 and 25 to 28              
          under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants'                
          brief (Paper No. 21, filed January 19, 1999).  A copy of                    
          claims 16 and 24 under appeal is set forth in the appendix to               
          the examiner's answer (Paper No. 22, mailed March 26, 1999).                


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Molins                   1,630,132                     May 24,              
          1927                                                                        
          Spencer                  RE 30,598                     May  5,              
          1981                                                                        



               Claims 16 to 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                  
          second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to                        
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter              
          which the appellants regard as the invention.                               









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007